Which of the following scenarios would be covered by the Good Samaritan Act?

The Good Samaritan Act is designed to encourage individuals to assist others in emergency situations by providing legal protection from liability, as long as the assistance is rendered in good faith and intended to help. Selecting the scenario where care is performed off duty in an emergency situation aligns perfectly with the essence of the Good Samaritan Act. This option reflects the principle that anyone, regardless of their professional role, can step in during an urgent circumstance to provide assistance without the fear of legal repercussions, as long as they are acting without gross negligence.

In contrast, providing care while on duty would typically fall under the jurisdiction and protocols of their employment, where they would not need the protections of the Good Samaritan Act since they are already trained and responsible for such situations as part of their job. Offering first aid in a non-emergency scenario does not qualify as an emergency situation and hence would not activate the protections meant to encourage spontaneous assistance during urgent situations. Performing routine health checks as part of a police role is again related to professional duties rather than a Good Samaritan scenario, as this indicates that the officer is functioning within their prescribed responsibilities rather than stepping in as a bystander in an emergency.